

Management Path
Breast Cancer
Genetic Test
For Physicians
1
Introduction
Which Women Need Screening
Get a clearer view of breast cancer risk
Combining monogenic breast cancer gene testing with a polygenic risk score (PRS) provides a more comprehensive and precise genetic risk assessment (1-4).
Fact: Most gene test reports (monogenic) are negative for rare high-risk genes for women with a family history.
More Comprehensive Risk Assessment: Layering the Galatea StrataRisk™ PRS analysis on top of traditional genetic testing, physicians can better stratify risk and make more personalized decisions about screening, prevention, and follow-up care, across many more women of all ancestries, compared to using gene panel testing only.
Our approach may be especially valuable for
-
Women with a family history of breast cancer but no identified high-risk gene mutations, including those with an uncertain findings (Variant of Uncertain Significance)
-
PRS offering additional risk insights for these patients (1-4)
-
-
For those with moderate-risk gene mutations (e.g., CHEK2, ATM), PRS can adjust their overall risk estimate, sometimes raising it to a high-risk level, guiding more precise management decisions (5-12).
-
Women with or without family history who want an accurate risk assessment (3). Incorporate genetic risk information improves the Tyrer-Cuzick scoring model's predictive accuracy of developing breast cancer (3, 8, 10).
2
Clinical Utilities
a. Pathogenic Variant Finding in a High-Risk Gene (e.g., BRCA1/2, PALB2)
-
Consider:
-
Enhanced surveillance (MRI + Mammogram)
-
Refer for risk-reducing intervention (such as surgery)
-
Genetic counseling follow-up
-
Cascade testing
-
-
PRS not required to make decision
b. Pathogenic Variant Finding in a Moderate-Risk Gene (e.g., CHEK2, ATM, etc)
Add Galatea StrataRisk™ PRS
-
If result is "HIGH Polygenic Risk"
-
Patients who have a pathogenic variant in a moderate-risk gene and who also have high PRS risk, may be considered to have overall high genetic risk for Breast Cancer. Such patients may benefit from earlier and more intensive screening with mammogram or breast MRI.
-
-
Consider:
-
Annual MRI + Mammogram
-
Cascade testing because risk (penetrance) associated with the monogenic finding is considered "high" instead of "moderate"
-
Genetic counseling follow-up
-
-
If result is "NOT HIGH Polygenic Risk"
-
Consider:
-
Follow current screening guidelines for moderate-penetrance breast cancer genes
-
-
c. No Pathogenic Variant, or Only a VUS was Detected
Add Galatea StrataRisk™ PRS
-
If result is "HIGH Polygenic Risk"
-
Consider:
-
Earlier and more frequent screening with MRI and/or Mammogram, or
-
Shared decision-making on earlier screening.
-
-
-
If result is "NOT HIGH Polygenic Risk"
-
Consider:
-
Routine screening appropriate for individuals without elevated genetic risk
-
Shared decision-making based on clinical risks and family history.
-
-
3
Indications for Genetic Testing
a. Individuals with a Family History of Breast Cancer
-
Especially if there’s no known BRCA1/2 or other monogenic mutation found
-
PRS can help stratify risk when single-gene testing is negative
b. Carriers of Moderate-Risk Gene Mutations
-
Such as CHEK2, ATM, or other genes with moderate penetrance
-
PRS helps refine risk and guide decisions about surveillance or preventive care
c. Women with a VUS finding in monogenic test results
-
Patients with a variant of uncertain significance (VUS)
-
For patients with a genetic finding where the clinical impact is unclear, adding PRS can help reassess overall risk.
-
While the VUS itself isn't actionable, a high polygenic risk score may still support closer monitoring or earlier screening discussions.
d. Women with No Family History but with Elevated Risk Based on Clinical Factors
-
Including age, breast density, or Tyrer-Cuzick score.
-
PRS adds genetic precision to clinical tools
e. Women Seeking Personalized Prevention Plans
-
Including shared decision making about early screening, MRI use, or lifestyle changes
Note: Our Testing is Specific to Women of All Ethnic Backgrounds
-
Galatea StrataRisk™ PRS is ancestry adjusted based on the patient's ethnic background, and has validated across diverse ancestries
-
The integrated approach increases accuracy at the patient level, and helps reduce disparities in risk prediction
f. Women with a Family or Personal History*
-
Breast Cancer diagnosed at age 50 or younger, or presenting as metastatic, multiple primaries, triple-negative, or lobular subtype.
-
At least one first- or second-degree relative with Breast Cancer diagnosed at age 50 or younger or Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
-
A personal history of a Primary Solid Tumor (excluding basal or squamous cell skin cancer) and a pathogenic variant was detected in tumor tissue that has clinical implications if detected in the germline (e.g., BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, PALB2, PMS2, RAD51C, RAD51D, RET, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, TMEM127, TSC2, VHL APC, PTEN, RB1, and TP53)
* Personal or family cancer history are likely to be insurance-covered indications for testing.
Contact us for more information on indications that may qualify for insurance coverage.
4
Test Description
-
Methods
-
Multi-Gene Hereditary Cancer Panel
-
Whole genome sequencing
-
-
Supplemental Polygenic Risk Score Analysis
-
-
Sample Requirements
-
Buccal Swab, Saliva or 3mL whole blood in EDTA tube
-
Sampling can be completed at patient's home.
-
-
Laboratory
-
Test is performed at Galatea's U.S. CLIA-certified and CAP-accredited clinical laboratory
-
5
Clinical Report
-
Multi-Gene Hereditary Cancer Test Report
-
Supplemental Polygenic Risk Score Report based on Emerging Clinical Evidence
Report Descriptions
a. Monogenic Findings (High- or Moderate-Risk Gene Mutations)
-
What’s reported:
-
Gene(s) tested: e.g., BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, ATM, TP53, etc.
-
-
Result status:
-
Positive (Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Variant): Indicates a hereditary breast cancer syndrome.
-
Negative: No known disease-causing variant found.
-
VUS (Variant of Uncertain Significance): A change was found, but its clinical meaning is unclear.
-
-
Clinical impact:
-
Positive findings often qualify patients for early screening, preventive intervention, or family cascade testing.
-
b. Polygenic Risk Score
-
What’s reported:
-
“High Polygenic risk” or Not High Polygenic Risk"
-
-
Interpretation:
-
Especially useful when patient is negative for high-risk single genes.
-
May further increase disease risk in moderate-risk gene carriers (like CHEK2 or ATM in breast cancer).
-
Result may be integrated with clinical information such as age, family history, and breast density (if provided) using a model like Tyrer–Cuzick to produce more accurate risk assessment.
-
c. Friendly and Reassuring
-
Patients who consent will receive a personalized ancestry report.
6
Physician and Insurance Support
Clinical interpretation of results and clinical reports are provided by Galatea’s certified laboratory.
Physician support is offered in partnership with Nova, which includes:
-
Assistance correlating symptoms and family history with variant findings
-
Help understanding test results and reports
-
Support in communicating findings with families
-
Next steps for follow-up or genetic counseling
Genetic Counseling Support is provided by Galatea-affiliated, licensed genetic counselors
Insurance Support is available to assist physicians and families with pre-authorization and billing.

References
-
Guidance for the Clinical Use of the Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Scores. Cancers 2025, 17, 1056.
-
"The adoption of breast cancer PRS testing represents a significant advancement in personalised medicine, namely in personalised screening. By incorporating PRSs into clinical practice, healthcare providers can offer more precise risk assessments, tailored prevention strategies, and optimized screening programs, ultimately improving patient outcomes and enhancing the efficiency of breast cancer care."
-
-
Clinical applicability of the Polygenic Risk Score for breast cancer risk prediction in familial cases. J Med Genet 2023; 60:327–336.
-
This study supports the implementation of a comprehensive risk prediction and shows the impact on clinical management recommendations for women from BC families as seen in the context of clinical genetic services.
-
-
Association of Polygenic-Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction With Patient Management. JCO Precis Oncol 9:e2400716 © 2025 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
-
Polygenic risk scores and breast cancer risk prediction. The Breast 67 (2023) 71–77.
-
Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nat Genet. 2018 September ; 50(9): 1219–1224.
-
Association of a Polygenic Risk Score With Breast Cancer Among Women Carriers of High- and Moderate-Risk Breast Cancer Genes. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e208501.
-
Risk of Breast Cancer Among Carriers of Pathogenic Variants in Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes Varies by Polygenic Risk Score. J Clin Oncol 2021, 39:2564-2573.
-
Comprehensive Breast Cancer Risk Assessment for CHEK2 and ATM Pathogenic Variant Carriers Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score and the Tyrer-Cuzick Model. JCO Precis Oncol 2021, 5:1073-1081.
-
Association of a Polygenic Risk Score With Breast Cancer Among Women Carriers of High- and Moderate-Risk Breast Cancer Genes. JAMA Network Open. 2020; 3(7).
-
Association and performance of polygenic risk scores for breast cancer among French women presenting or not a familial predisposition to the disease. European Journal of Cancer
Volume 179, January 2023, Pages 76-86. -
The benefit of adding polygenic risk scores, lifestyle factors, and breast density to family history and genetic status for breast cancer risk and surveillance classification of unaffected women from germline CHEK2 c.1100delC families. The Breast 75 (2024) 103724.
-
Performance of Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Scores in 760 Female CHEK2 Germline Mutation Carriers. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst (2021) 113(7)


Why the Galatea Test is Different?
More Comprehensive Risk Assessment
Monogenic + Polygenic Interpretation
-
Traditional hereditary breast cancer testing focuses on rare, high-impact mutations in genes like BRCA1 or BRCA2. However, these monogenic (single gene) findings only explain a portion of inherited risk.
-
Adding a polygenic risk score (PRS) helps account for the remaining genetic risk by evaluating the combined effect of many common variants (SNPs) - enabling more complete, ancestry-inclusive, and personalized risk assessment.
Ancestry-Adjusted PRS
Applicable to your patient populations
-
Our polygenic risk score is calibrated specifically for each ethnic group - including White, Hispanic, Black, Asian, and mixed-race individuals, to provide more accurate risk assessment across diverse populations.
-
Our PRS may be more accurate compared to those derived from studies focusing mainly on individuals of European ancestry.
-
Friendly and Reassuring
-
With consent, the patients get a personalized ancestry report.
-
Genome-Wide PRS
More accurate polygenic risk assessment
-
Up to a million genetic markers (SNPs) are used in our scoring process for breast cancer risk.
-
Our PRS provides a more accurate and personalized risk estimate than methods that rely only on high-impact SNPs based on a small number of studies.
-
Studies have shown that PRS derived from genome wide SNP analysis may be more accurate than those using only a small number of high risk SNPs.

Why is Nova Physician and Patient Support Different?
Physician Burden Reduction
Nova Patient-Friendly Report
-
The supplemental report accompanying the prostate cancer genetic test clinical report provides a clear explanation of findings in plain language, designed to help patients better understand their results and associated risks.
-
This patient-facing summary is intended to support effective communication between clinicians and individuals undergoing testing, making the entire process smoother and more supportive.